May 24, 2007
Persnickety Grammar Moment Of The Week
![]() |
I've mellowed on the whole "pluralizing with an apostrophe" kick. First off, there's a dude in the paper who covers that for me. Second off, I write x-thousand words a day, I'm sure I've done it myself in my darkest of moments. But, you, Daily News sports staff -- or whoever keyed in the headline on the web -- have no excuse for writing "Phil's." Unless Philadelphia Phil and Phyllis won the game and not the local baseball nine1... ahem, ahem.
1 And even then, it still doesn't work. I mean, Philadelphia Phil and Phyllis never win.
Rod and unreal [Daily News]
Posted by D-Mac on May 24, 2007 09:00 AM
Posted to Daily News
, Grammar
, Pluralizing With An Apostrophe
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.philadelphiaweekly.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/5466
Comments
errr.. wouldn't that apostrophe be taking the place of "lie" in phillies? Granted phils is an acceptable nickname, but maybe there is some sort mega-grammar-stickler over at the DN
Posted by: Anonymous at May 24, 2007 10:44 AM
mis-placed possessives are second to putting everything in "quotes" for no good reason- other than it was a way for typesetters to make the letters italic in the olden days.....
Especially when this stuff happens on "professional" produced signage!!
Grrrrrrrrr
Posted by: firepixx at May 24, 2007 03:29 PM




no, then it *still* wouldn't take an apostrophe, unless you want it to be possessive...
Posted by: acm at May 24, 2007 10:38 AM